Re: An Unwed Librarian! Oh, the Horror! (Score: 1)
posted Saturday, December 27, 2008 - 06:37 PM (
#46334)
Okay, now. With all genuine respect to the original poster, this meme has been floating around a bit this year (the New York Times even touched on it) and while it IS funny, it neglects a few things in the interest of a punch-line.
1) Mary wanted George. Mary wanted George even before George knew what he wanted in a personal life. The movie makes this explicitly clear at a couple of points.
Thus, a world where George doesn't exist is plausible as a tragedy for Mary. Not because she doesn't have a husband, but because she _never met the man she would have chosen for a husband_.
To look closer to home: it's fairly obvious that Dave Kellett adores his wife in a way that you don't typically see often. In a world where she did not exist, it's very possible that missing that potential "soul mate" level of connection, Dave could've become a "grey little man" too.
To reference another holiday classic -- the Alistair Sim Scrooge -- remember when Scrooge's nephew says "My marriage was the making of me"? I hear a lot of guys confess to this in private.
So, it's not what Mary missed (marriage) so much as who (marriage to George).
2) You've got to remember that this is a sixty-some-odd year old movie, and you really do have to allow for _historical social context_ folks.
As goofy as it seems now, the general social consensus back when It's A Wonderful Life was made was that the highest acheivement a woman could aim for in life was a happy marriage of her own choosing.
Sexist? Yup. But IAWL was reflective of its times in this. Following on this widely-held belief was the idea that if you did not marry as a woman, it was because no one wanted you -- that you were somehow unloveable.
The librarian thing? Back then, the idea persisted that most spinsters (never-married old ladies)became librarians. I don't know where the cliche started, but it was strong enough to be reflected here as a kind of "short form" for unhappy spinster.
So ... in context, when Clarence announces, "She never married!" it's supposed to be taken as "She never got what she wanted. She lived a life lonely and unloved!"
The idea is, Mary went from having what she really wanted for herself, to being essentially a social outcast and alone (in the context of the times) never realizing _anything_ she wanted for herself.
If they were to remake IAWL (please, God, no), the Pottersville Mary might be a housewife trapped in an unhappy marriage (to Potter?) while in Bedford Falls she would doubtless be some sort of career woman who also had the man she loves as her husband.
The unmarried librarian thing is just a form of social short-forming whose context has been lost over time.
Again, not trying to pee on anyone's parade, but when even the NYT forgets to factor in these details, I hadda vent somewhere.
Apologies, Dave,
DrS